Training organisations
Enrolments, funding agreements, invitations, attendance, invoices, audits: a learner's file crosses six tools and three people. Every handover is a possible re-entry.
« The enrolment form copied by hand into the CRM »
« The funder follow-up that depends on who remembers »
« The invoice issued when someone thinks of it »
« Audit documents rebuilt on request »
Your tools, connected
A file that lives on its own, end to end
Your learners' data stays in France, on a machine in your name. Useful on the day of an audit — or a sale.
What changes, with proof
We replace nothing and sell no extra tool. Your team keeps what they know; we build underneath: the data, the rules, the connections.
Proof
At a training network: a file goes from the web form to the funding agreement with no re-entry and no manual follow-up — invoice issued, cash collected, document produced and sent, on its own.
Someone takes ownership: arbitrates technical choices, writes the processes, implements, documents, trains the team — and stays responsible for the result.
Proof
One hour of decisions per sprint for the owner, zero operational time taken from the team — and every release that changes something for them ships with its training video, not a PDF nobody reads.
Every sprint ends in production usable the next day. Everything is in the client's name: code, database, server, access. You can stop after any sprint.
Proof
The sentence that matters in a meeting: “We have no way to hold you — which is exactly what makes our clients calm.”
Every automatic task leaves a trace. A failure triggers an immediate alert — never a discovery three weeks too late. And you run it from one screen: pending, invoiced, collected, sales per rep.
Proof
Automatic unpaid-invoice reminders at D+2, D+4, D+6, D+8, then an alert to the sales rep. The reminder goes out on its own; a human steps in only when it matters.
The questions we get
Exactly — that is the right comparison. An ops manager costs €6–9k a month fully loaded, takes four months to find, and one day leaves with everything they know. Here: no recruiting, first result in production within two weeks, commitment limited to the current month — and the system stays.
That is the case for almost all our clients, which is why the model is built the opposite way from agencies: every sprint ends in usable production, you stop when you want, and everything is in your name from day one. Your real risk is never more than one month.
They have nothing new to learn: they keep their current tools — the system works underneath. At our training client, the team works in the tools they already knew; what disappeared is the re-entry in between. And when a detail changes in their day, it comes with its two-minute walkthrough video — not a manual.
We do not take your operational time: the organisational work is prepared on our own, and you arbitrate in one hour per sprint. One hour of decisions rather than a half-day workshop.
A person organises, they don't build — and the knowledge leaves with them. The system stays, trains the next hires, and costs less. And if you hire later, that person inherits a clean machine instead of a building site.
Anything can break — the difference is that nothing breaks in silence: every task leaves a trace, a failure triggers an immediate alert, and maintenance covers the fix with support within 24 business hours. The danger is never the outage; it is the outage nobody sees.
For three isolated automations: yes, take Zapier — we will tell you so ourselves. The difference shows when the system becomes vital: those tools bill per execution, so they tax your growth, cap the calls between your tools, and when a scenario breaks nobody knows where or why. Our system costs the same at 8 people or 40, and every action leaves a trace.
Everything is already yours: the server, the code, the accounts and the data are in your name from day one — not handed over at the end. Documentation and videos ship every sprint. And the system is built with standard technologies: any developer can take it over, which any independent technical opinion can verify. Ask your CRM vendor the same question.
Next step
Thirty minutes to describe the life of one file, end to end. If a system is not the right answer, we will say so.